Shipmates,
What the heck, I'll chime in!
Sea Haven
1978
Hull 124
Universal Atomic 4
Reduction Gear/Coupling: Paragon with Walter V-Drive.
Prop: This is off my Survey Report: "Fixed 3 Bladed bronze by Michegan, 16LH8. Intact and sights true."
Now I know for a FACT it's a RH prop, just look at the photo!

Ed "Dolce Vita" speaks A4 truth lol!!
You spin that clockwise when looking FWD while off the stern and in a few minutes Sea Haven will be hard to swim back to!
Bad Surveyor aside, I'm 99% sure Sea Havens shaft is offset to STARBOARD. Which is opposite of Ed's Dolce Vita!
I have to finish decommissioning her this weekend so I can up that to 100% (or not!) lol
From a prop walk point of view in the boat designers mind I would think if you need shaft offset to remove it, put the offset to the side it would do good. As my stern would want to walk to starboard as I power forward, it SHOULD be somewhat countered by the thrust vector offset of a shaft angle to starboard like mine. Which would be a good thing! Like a constant bit of right rudder!
However, all things being equal I find I have to give her a slight right rudder under power to keep her true. So my offset thrust to stbd is having little effect on my prop walk, and the stern walks to stbd forcing me to make minor course corrections. But there could be other factors here I'm missing (too much rudder play?) that I need to determine as I learn more about my new to me boat. a LOT more to learn lol!!
"Sub' Ed
PS: I just stared at that photo for the umpteenth time. I need to have a closer look at the prop, and have the yard look at this too. Looking at the blade shape, I'm getting the nagging feeling that previous owner installed it 180 degrees out, aka bassackwards! I know he did most, if not all the work himself (as evidenced by the 5 gal bucket of house wiring and AC wire nuts I pulled out!) So I think if I'm right the trailing edge of the blade is being used as the leading edge and vice versa! That makes the suction back now the pressure face! How much lift does an airplane wing get if it could fly in reverse? I wouldn't get on that plane! lol This makes for very inefficient thrust in our case. Maybe that's why the surveyor thought it was LH??
FWIW, as I told Ed offline I can't get her above 2K rpm, I thought this might be a cylinder compression issue, which now seems to have resolved itself (No. 3 was 60, now 100 psi), so I suspect clogged exhaust. This would definitely add to it!
What an epiphany!!